I’m trying something new. This is my first attempt at a poll for this site and I’m going to use it to ask your feedback.
Please let me know your thoughts and suggestions as to what you like and would like to see more of….
I’m trying something new. This is my first attempt at a poll for this site and I’m going to use it to ask your feedback.
Please let me know your thoughts and suggestions as to what you like and would like to see more of….
Filed under Polls
This is the idiot they elected in Virginia’s Fifth Congressional District, my old home district, to replace the excellent Tom Perriello…
Click the link to go to ThinkProgress.org and see the video….
Newly-elected Rep. Robert Hurt (R-VA) campaigned for Congress on a promise to repeal health reform. This week, Hurt granted ThinkProgress a short interview outside of the Capitol, where he doubled down on his pledge to remove health reform. However, Hurt said he would not opt-out of the government health care granted to him and his staff as a member of Congress:
HURT: I’ll support the repeal. Okay, what else?
TP: After you vote to repeal health care, will you also reject government-sponsored, government-subsidized health care given to members of Congress?
HURT: Uhm, well obviously we’ve got — I’ve got a health insurance policy that I pay for through the government so I don’t really–
TP: Well there’s $700 a month in taxpayer money on average that goes to a member of Congress’s health care plan given by you know the taxpayer.
HURT: It’s a policy that’s issued by Anthem and it’s a policy that any– it’s open to the public.
TP: But my tax dollars and everyone’s tax dollars subsidize your plan as a member of Congress. And all of your staff members. You’ve got what, thirty members of your staff? Do you think they should have government-sponsored health care if you’re going to repeal it for everyone else?
HURT: If you’re going to pay members of Congress anything, if they’re going to have a salary and they’re going to have benefits, like so many people who are employed do, then I think it’s not unreasonable to offer those benefits. So I support that.
Hurt tried to initially deny that he received any special health care and that his plan is available to the public. In fact, the regulated private insurance that Hurt and his staff receive is not open to the general public because the general public does not have access to a regulate exchange or to taxpayer subsidies.
Members of Congress on average receive a $700 a month taxpayer subsidy for their private health insurance plan, which they can choose through a highly regulated exchange offered by the government. The federal system mirrors the reforms enacted by Democrats and President Obama, which end health insurance abuses by regulating coverage through an exchange, while offering subsidies to individuals and small businesses to make coverage more affordable.
Filed under Danville, Health Care, Politics, The Economy, Virginia
Of course facts mean nothing to the GOP and, apparently, a lot of voters….
Just as House Republicans gear up to repeal the “job killing” Affordable Care Act, the Department of Labor is reporting that the U.S. economy added 103,000 jobs last month, pushing the jobless rate down to a 19-month low of 9.4 percent.
In fact, since President Obama signed health reform into law on March 23, 2010, the economy has created approximately a total of 1.1 million new jobs in the private sector. One-fifth of the new jobs — over 200,000 — have been in the health care industry. Nevertheless, Republicans have spent the week decrying health reform as “job killing” legislation. Watch a compilation:
Aside from the fact that increasing access to health services will create thousands of jobs in the health care sector, Harvard economist David Cutler argues in new paper released this morning that repealing the health law would reverse these gains and could destroy 250,000 to 400,000 jobs annually over the next decade. Eliminating the law would increase health care costs and cause employers to reduce wages and cut jobs for those employees who already receive minimum wage or are in fixed contracts. From the report:
Filed under Health Care, Politics, The Economy
More interesting information from ThinkProgress.org that you won’t hear from the conventional media and certainly not from Faux News…
This morning, the Labor Department released its employment data for December, showing that the U.S. economy ended the year by adding 113,000 private sector jobs, knocking the unemployment rate down sharply from 9.8 percent to 9.4 percent — its lowest rate since July 2009. The “surprising drop — which was far better than the modest step-down economists had forecast — was the steepest one-month fall since 1998.” October and November’s jobs numbers were also revised upward by almost 80,000 each. Still, 14.5 million Americans remain unemployed, and jobs will have to be created much faster in coming months for the country to pull itself out of the economic doldrums.
Responding the jobs report, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) noted that President Obama and the Democratic Congress have created “more jobs in 2010 than President Bush did over eight years.”
Indeed, from February 2001, Bush’s first full month in office, through January 2009, his last, the economy added just 1 million jobs. By contrast, in 2010 alone, the economy added at least 1.1 million jobs. This chart, produced by Pelosi’s office, demonstrates the difference between the Bush administration and the Obama administration on jobs:
MORE: ThinkProgress » Obama Created More Jobs In One Year Than Bush Created In Eight.
Filed under Politics, The Economy
I’m sorry, but the GOP hypocrisy is turning deadly.
Isn’t this the Party that made so much noise about “Death Panels” during the Health Care Reform Debate? Looks like they are the ones who ultimately instituted them…
PHOENIX — A second person denied transplant coverage by Arizona under a state budget cut has died, with this death “most likely” resulting from the coverage reduction, a hospital spokeswoman said Wednesday.
University Medical Center spokeswoman Jo Marie Gellerman said the patient died Dec. 28 at another medical facility after earlier being removed from UMC’s list for a liver transplant needed because of hepatitis C.
Gellerman cited medical privacy requirements in declining to release any information about the patient.
Arizona reduced Medicaid coverage for transplants on Oct. 1 under cuts included to help close a shortfall in the state budget enacted last spring.
Officials at the Tucson, Ariz., hospital said the patient’s death “most likely” resulted from Arizona’s scaling back coverage for transplants, she said.
It’s impossible to say with 100 percent certainty whether the patient would have died anyway, Gellerman said, “but we do know that his condition has gotten more severe since he was taken off the list.”
More from the Huffington Post: 2nd Arizona Patient Dies After State Budget Cuts Deny Transplant.
Filed under Health Care, Politics, The Economy
Gag me…
This just caps a day of insanity…
John Edwards has “reportedly” asked mistress Rielle Hunter to marry him, according to tabloid magazine The National Enquirer.
The Hollywood Gossip has a screenshot of the latest issue of the Enquirer, the publication that broke the original story about Edwards’s liaison with Hunter, his campaign videographer, and predicts that the two might tie the knot this summer, if at all.
While the Enquirer gained some credibility for its coverage of the Edwards affair, it is worth noting that they posted nearly the exact same story regarding an Edwards-Hunter nuptial and a “luxury $3.5 million beachfront home” last year, a report that was later denied.
John Edwards’s wife, Elizabeth Edwards, passed away last month after a battle with cancer. In her will, she left her possessions to her three children, while leaving out her estranged husband entirely.
Filed under North Carolina, Politics
More on the Republican’s trying to alter the facts…
From John Arovosis at Americablog.com
It’s really quite egregious what the Republicans in the House are trying to do, now in their second day of running the US House. The Republicans are trying to make it so that CBO is no longer the arbiter of how much legislation costs, and whether it adds or subtracts from the deficit.
For those who don’t know, the Congressional Budget Office is an independent agency of the Congress. Neither the Democrats nor the Republicans run it. It is completely independent. But the Republicans are unhappy that CBO has concluded, repeatedly, that last year’s health care reform legislation will save over $100bn over the next ten years, and they’re even more unhappy that CBO has just upped its numbers to $230bn for the cost of repealing HCR over the next ten years.
So, when they’re confronted with incontrovertible facts, the Republicans attack the source, and lie.
Every single journalist working in Washington, DC knows about CBO. They know CBO is independent, and that CBO is what we use to “score” legislation, period. The Republicans can not be permitted to get away with removing CBO as the final arbiter of how much legislation costs. The damage to decision-making in Washington would be tremendous. The Republicans in the House literally issued their own analysis today of what they think health care reform will cost. And nobody cares. It’s irrelevant what the Republicans in the House, or frankly the White House, “thinks” health care reform will save us. What matters is what independent impartial arbiters say, and that’s CBO.
More: AMERICAblog News: Sorry Boehner, you don’t get to overrule CBO.
Filed under Health Care, Politics
Talk about inconvenient truths….
Of course, the GOP Leadership has a way of just ignoring any facts that are inconvenient to their agenda…
Moments ago, the Congressional Budget Office released its cost estimate for the GOP’s health care repeal bill — H.R. 2, the Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Law Act, introduced yesterday in the House by the new Republican majority:
– 32 million Americans will lose coverage compared to current law: “Under H.R. 2, about 32 million fewer nonelderly people would have health insurance in 2019, leaving a total of about 54 million nonelderly people uninsured. The share of legal nonelderly residents with insurance coverage in 2019 would be about 83 percent, compared with a projected share of 94 percent under current law (and 83 percent currently).” (p. 8-9)
– Increases deficit by $230 billion over 10 years: “Consequently, over the 2012–2021 period, the effect of H.R. 2 on federal deficits as a result of changes in direct spending and revenues is likely to be an increase in the vicinity of $230 billion, plus or minus the effects of technical and economic changes to CBO’s and JCT’s projections for that period.” (p. 5)
– Huge deficit increases over next decade: “Correspondingly, CBO estimates that enacting H.R. 2 would increase federal deficits in the decade after 2019 by an amount that is in a broad range around one-half percent of GDP, plus or minus the effects of technical and economic changes that CBO and JCT will include in the forthcoming estimate. For the decade beginning after 2021, the effect of H.R. 2 on federal deficits as a share of the economy would probably be somewhat larger.” (p. 7)
– Individuals would pay more for health insurance: “Although premiums in the individual market would be lower, on average, under H.R. 2 than under current law, many people would end up paying more for health insurance— because under current law, the majority of enrollees purchasing coverage in that market would receive subsidies via the insurance exchanges, and H.R. 2 would eliminate those subsidies.” (p. 9-10)
– Average health care benefits would be worse: “In particular, if H.R. 2 was enacted… the average insurance policy in this market would cover a smaller share of enrollees’ costs for health care and a slightly narrower range of benefits.” (p.9)
– Premiums for employer-sponsored insurance would increase: “Premiums for employment-based coverage obtained through large employers would be slightly higher under H.R. 2 than under current law, reflecting the net impact of many relatively small changes.” (p. 10)
Filed under Health Care, Politics, The Economy
After just one day in power, the Republicans are backing off their promises to the Masses.
I’m not surprised and don’t know why anyone should be…
But then, I still don’t know why people voted for the Party that drove the economy into a ditch just three years ago…
P.T. Barnum was right, our electorate proves “there’s a sucker born every minute”.
Yesterday, Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) gaveled in the GOP takeover of the House. Christening his rein in tears, the self-proclaimed “most transparent person in this town” promised an era of more “honest” and “accountable” government with a set of new House rules to match. But that was yesterday afternoon. By nightfall, the House GOP leadership had already broken key pledges of transparency and accountability. Republicans have already walked back three key promises they touted up through the end of 111th Congress:
Filed under History, Politics, The Economy
My Thoughts: Why Politics Matter
I’m tired of people saying Politics doesn’t matter and tuning out of the Political process. Not only is this an abdication of responsibility, it’s stupid.
Politics does matter and the votes taken in various elected bodies do impact everyone’s life.
In fact, Political decisions impact almost every aspect of day-to-day life. Here are a few things to keep in mind:
These are just a few impacts off the top of my head. So when I hear people say they aren’t voting or that one side is as bad as the other, or that it just doesn’t matter, it pisses me off.
Admittedly, I am passionate about this…I used to work in Politics and spent a good deal of time in Washington and Richmond. I have been “behind the curtain.” I’ve smoked cigarettes over cocktails at the Congressional Club with now Speaker John Boehner and ridden the back roads of Virginia with Senator John Warner. I know neither side is perfect and I well know how the “other side”-for whom I used to work- manipulates the process and puts out false information. I’ve seen the decline in civility by both sides and made my well-known choice.
I came to the conclusion that the Republicans look backwards with fear while the Democrats look forward with hope. I’ve also reached the conclusion the Republicans cater to the wealthy and Corporate elite- as do the Democrats to a lesser degree. This is an informed, fact-based decision I made as part of my personal journey. You can disagree with me, but you can’t call me uniformed or accuse me of not thoroughly examining the issues to reach my decisions.
I also think we have a moral obligation in America to ensure our elected officials don’t forget the poor, the sick, the hungry, the elderly, college students hungry for learning but limited in funds and the homeless. I think one of the main purposes of government is to ensure we have safe, reliable transportations– by road, by air and most urgently by train. I think the government should level the playing field by allowing those who are born to less have the same opportunities as those who are born with more. I think the government should ensure our food supply is safe, but not over burden local growers. I think a lot of things…
I don’t expect everyone to agree with me, but I do expect them to be involved and to make fact-based decisions. I can respect that…
I can’t respect people who tune out facts or don’t do their own due diligence.
Here are a few things to keep in mind:
For Democracy to work, you must have an informed, active electorate. I hope people are paying attention to what is going on in Washington, the State Houses and the Supreme Court. These decisions do matter and do impact your lives.
The Elites count on people being confused, misinformed and lazy when-and if- they vote. It’s up to us to prove them wrong. We haven’t done a great job the last year or so…
I may be dreaming, but here are a few things that I think would help rectify the situation:
We need to encourage people to pay attention by restoring trust in the media and elected officials who represent the Public Trust.
This is not a game.
It is not a reality TV show.
Bottom Line: Get serious, people!
Discuss among yourselves….
Share this:
3 Comments
Filed under Education, Health Care, History, My Journey, Politics, Race, Religion, Social Commentary, The Economy, The Environment, The South, Virginia
Tagged as democrat, economy, Elections, history, politics, Republican