Category Archives: The Economy

2nd Arizona Patient Dies After State Budget Cuts Deny Transplant

I’m sorry, but the GOP hypocrisy is turning deadly.

Isn’t this the Party that made so much noise about “Death Panels” during the Health Care Reform Debate?  Looks like they are the ones who ultimately instituted them…

PHOENIX — A second person denied transplant coverage by Arizona under a state budget cut has died, with this death “most likely” resulting from the coverage reduction, a hospital spokeswoman said Wednesday.

University Medical Center spokeswoman Jo Marie Gellerman said the patient died Dec. 28 at another medical facility after earlier being removed from UMC’s list for a liver transplant needed because of hepatitis C.

Gellerman cited medical privacy requirements in declining to release any information about the patient.

Arizona reduced Medicaid coverage for transplants on Oct. 1 under cuts included to help close a shortfall in the state budget enacted last spring.

Officials at the Tucson, Ariz., hospital said the patient’s death “most likely” resulted from Arizona’s scaling back coverage for transplants, she said.

It’s impossible to say with 100 percent certainty whether the patient would have died anyway, Gellerman said, “but we do know that his condition has gotten more severe since he was taken off the list.”

More from the Huffington Post:   2nd Arizona Patient Dies After State Budget Cuts Deny Transplant.

Leave a comment

Filed under Health Care, Politics, The Economy

New CBO Analysis: GOP’s Push For Health Law Repeal Would Increase Deficit By $230 Billion Over 10 Years

Talk about inconvenient truths….

Of course, the GOP Leadership has a way of just ignoring any facts that are inconvenient to their agenda…

Moments ago, the Congressional Budget Office released its cost estimate for the GOP’s health care repeal bill — H.R. 2, the Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Law Act, introduced yesterday in the House by the new Republican majority:

– 32 million Americans will lose coverage compared to current law: “Under H.R. 2, about 32 million fewer nonelderly people would have health insurance in 2019, leaving a total of about 54 million nonelderly people uninsured. The share of legal nonelderly residents with insurance coverage in 2019 would be about 83 percent, compared with a projected share of 94 percent under current law (and 83 percent currently).” (p. 8-9)

– Increases deficit by $230 billion over 10 years: “Consequently, over the 2012–2021 period, the effect of H.R. 2 on federal deficits as a result of changes in direct spending and revenues is likely to be an increase in the vicinity of $230 billion, plus or minus the effects of technical and economic changes to CBO’s and JCT’s projections for that period.” (p. 5)

– Huge deficit increases over next decade: “Correspondingly, CBO estimates that enacting H.R. 2 would increase federal deficits in the decade after 2019 by an amount that is in a broad range around one-half percent of GDP, plus or minus the effects of technical and economic changes that CBO and JCT will include in the forthcoming estimate. For the decade beginning after 2021, the effect of H.R. 2 on federal deficits as a share of the economy would probably be somewhat larger.” (p. 7)

– Individuals would pay more for health insurance: “Although premiums in the individual market would be lower, on average, under H.R. 2 than under current law, many people would end up paying more for health insurance— because under current law, the majority of enrollees purchasing coverage in that market would receive subsidies via the insurance exchanges, and H.R. 2 would eliminate those subsidies.” (p. 9-10)

– Average health care benefits would be worse: “In particular, if H.R. 2 was enacted… the average insurance policy in this market would cover a smaller share of enrollees’ costs for health care and a slightly narrower range of benefits.” (p.9)

– Premiums for employer-sponsored insurance would increase: “Premiums for employment-based coverage obtained through large employers would be slightly higher under H.R. 2 than under current law, reflecting the net impact of many relatively small changes.” (p. 10)

More:   ThinkProgress » New CBO Analysis: GOP’s Push For Health Law Repeal Would Increase Deficit By $230 Billion Over 10 Years.

Leave a comment

Filed under Health Care, Politics, The Economy

Broken Promises: The House GOP Breaks Several Of Its Own Pledges On First Day In Power

After just one day in  power, the Republicans are backing off their promises to the Masses.

I’m not surprised and don’t know why anyone should be…

But then, I still don’t know why people voted for the Party that drove the economy into a ditch just three years ago…

P.T. Barnum was right, our electorate proves “there’s a sucker born every minute”.

Yesterday, Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) gaveled in the GOP takeover of the House. Christening his rein in tears, the self-proclaimed “most transparent person in this town” promised an era of more “honest” and “accountable” government with a set of new House rules to match. But that was yesterday afternoon. By nightfall, the House GOP leadership had already broken key pledges of transparency and accountability. Republicans have already walked back three key promises they touted up through the end of 111th Congress:

More:   ThinkProgress » Broken Promises: The House GOP Breaks Several Of Its Own Pledges On First Day In Power.

Leave a comment

Filed under History, Politics, The Economy

How We’re Learning to Be Happy With Less – Yahoo! News

More good news today…

It would be a major achievement for people in the U.S. to start appreciating what they have and not lust for more “stuff”.

The economy is still in rehab, but it doesn’t bother us all that much any more. In fact, we seem to be feeling nearly as good as we did before that awful recession messed everything up.

That’s what Americans have been telling the Gallup polling organization–and the nation’s mood suggests that the recession may have made us a wee bit heartier. We seem to be happier with less, for one thing, and we may even be getting more satisfaction out of the “little things” that took a back seat for a while to fancy cars, splashy homes, and tell-everybody vacations.

Gallup’s “well-being index” shows that Americans felt more happiness and less stress in 2010 than they did in 2009, which isn’t surprising, since 2009 was the year the economy hit bottom, unemployment surged, and the stock market hit a 13-year low. What is surprising is that the latest well-being numbers are comparable to those of February 2008–which was a high point before the nation’s mood began to sour and then turn downright grim as the financial panic hit in the fall of that year.

And

So why are we feeling just as content today as we did during better economic times? Maybe because we’ve changed our expectations and placed less importance on economic gain. Don’t get me wrong: I’m not suggesting that utopianism trumps consumerism. But Americans do seem to be saying they can be just as satisfied in an austere economic environment as they once were in an indulgent one. In addition to economic factors, Gallup’s well-being index also measures things such as the way people evaluate their own physical and emotional health, and whether people feel like they’re struggling or thriving. And those metrics suggest that more people have learned to be happy under tougher economic conditions. The percentage of Americans who feel they’re thriving, for example, is 54 percent in the latest survey. And the percentage who say they’re struggling is 43 percent. Both of those levels are better than they were at the beginning of 2008, when Gallup began doing its well-being surveys.

More:   How We’re Learning to Be Happy With Less – Yahoo! News.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics, Social Commentary, The Economy

Michael G. Messner – Olmsted’s ideals could help solve our real estate mess

This is great thinking…

Take empty stores and buildings, tear them down and build parks.  This would put people to work, reduce urban blight and have land available for use by new businesses near the parks as the economy turns around.

Makes sense to me…

From The Washington Post…

More than 150 years ago, America’s greatest landscape architect, Frederick Law Olmsted, created Central Park and changed New York forever. He went on to transform dozens more cities, leaving a priceless legacy of vibrant, beautiful cityscapes. And, in the process, he increased property values.

Olmsted discovered this himself when he tracked the value of land around Central Park and found that the city’s $13 million investment had led to an astounding $209 million increase in just 17 years. The architect recognized what many planners still fail to grasp: Parks and managed green space are vital pieces of urban infrastructure that not only improve the quality of life for millions of people but also drive economic growth.

Today we must act again to transform our cities. The commercial real estate binge of the past decade and the growth of online shopping as an alternative to brick-and-mortar stores have left more than 200,000 acres of vacant retail, office and industrial space. Residential real estate is a massive problem as well. Distressed properties are a drag on our communities and the economy and threaten to topple even more banks that hold mortgages on these “toxic assets.”

We need to move these toxic assets off the banks’ books, reduce the surplus of commercial space and create jobs, all while revitalizing our cities. This brings us back to Olmsted.

Olmsted designed transformative parks, campuses and greenways; his firm completed an amazing 6,000 commissions and launched a green wave across 19th-century America. The same kind of wave could help resolve the 21st-century real estate mess.

We don’t have the luxury of vacant land that Olmsted often started with, so we must bulldoze underperforming and underused property, put people to work creating parks on some of the land and “bank” the rest until the economy recovers.

More:   Michael G. Messner – Olmsted’s ideals could help solve our real estate mess.

Leave a comment

Filed under History, Politics, Style, The Economy

Aisle Not: Why One Woman Quit Grocery Stores for a Year | TakePart – Inspiration to Action

I would love to be able to get to this point…

I hate the professional Food Industry almost as much as the Pharmaceutical Industry….

Both have greatly contributed to the unhealthy, over-weight lifestyle so many Americans now lead…

If you haven’t seen “Food, Inc”, buy it or put it on your NetFlix list today.  It’s a real eye-opener.

One year ago, Carla Crownover kissed grocery stores goodbye.

She had just seen Food, Inc., Participant Media’s documentary on the seedy underbelly of the food industry, and she wanted nothing to do with the conventional food system that feeds the majority of Americans.

She pledged to abstain from grocery stores for 365 days and to go on a quest to find out where all the food she eats comes from. The end result? “I’ve learned a lot,” she told readers on her blog, Austin Urban Gardens.

TakePart caught up with Crownover recently, fresh after her one-year mark, to learn more about what it’s like to live off the food grid.

Prior to seeing Food, Inc., Crownover was already a conscientious eater. “I shopped the perimeter of the grocery store and didn’t buy many products in boxes or cans. I didn’t want to eat anything that had been manipulated to cook faster, or be ‘instant,'” she explains. “I had dropped diet sodas from my diet a couple years ago, and was leery of foods manipulated to have a long shelf life.”

When she sought out more information from Food, Inc., the film shocked her.

“Everything about factory farming [in the film] disgusted me. The feedlots packed full of animals standing in their own waste bothered me on several levels. I like to eat beef, but I don’t want the animal to have to live a horrible and unhealthy life so that I can have a steak.”

She saw genetically engineered chickens in the film that were too big to stand and never saw the light of day. “The chickens I get now from a local farm are free range up until their last moment,” she says. “The farmer once told me, ‘We like to believe they only have one bad day.’ And I loved that.”

via Aisle Not: Why One Woman Quit Grocery Stores for a Year | TakePart – Inspiration to Action.

Leave a comment

Filed under Education, Food, Health Care, Pets, Politics, Social Commentary, The Economy, The Environment

Get Ready for a G.O.P. Rerun – NYTimes.com

Another great article from Bob Herbert:

You just can’t close the door on this crowd. The party that brought us the worst economy since the Great Depression, that led us into Iraq and the worst foreign policy disaster in American history, that would like to take a hammer to Social Security and a chisel to Medicare, is back in control of the House of Representatives with the expressed mission of undermining all things Obama.

Once we had Dick Cheney telling us that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and belligerently asserting that deficits don’t matter. We had Phil Gramm, Enron’s favorite senator and John McCain’s economic guru, blithely assuring us in 2008 that we were suffering from a “mental recession.”

(Mr. Gramm was some piece of work. A champion of deregulation, he was disdainful of ordinary people. “We’re the only nation in the world,” he once said, “where all of our poor people are fat.”)

Maybe the voters missed the entertainment value of the hard-hearted, compulsively destructive G.O.P. headliners. Maybe they viewed them the way audiences saw the larger-than-life villains in old-time melodramas. It must be something like that because it’s awfully hard to miss the actual policies of a gang that almost wrecked the country.

MORE:   Get Ready for a G.O.P. Rerun – NYTimes.com.

Leave a comment

Filed under History, Race, The Economy

Dems Accuse GOP Of ‘Enron-Type Accounting’ And Assaults On CBO

It’s already getting interesting…

I wonder if anyone will notice how the GOP is changing the rules and attempting to put forth an alternate reality.

No one seems to have noticed so far….or they wouldn’t be back in power in the House…

WASHINGTON — Congressional Democrats, removed from their rhetorical shackles by the coming Republican control of the House, are accusing the GOP of resorting to “Enron-type accounting” in their efforts to push legislation in the next Congress.

Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), the incoming ranking member of the House Budget Committee, warned on Tuesday that Republican leadership is set to implement new rules that would effectively do away with the Congressional Budget Office. The CBO is often regarded as a nonpartisan, independent scorekeeper for Congress. And by taking away its input in legislative matters, Van Hollen said, Republicans were ushering in an era of make-your-own-reality-based budgeting.

“This is a huge loophole for Enron-type accounting … In the rule they pass tomorrow they are going to reiterate that the chair of the budget committee has the authority to come up with his own estimate of the budget impact of various pieces of legislation,” Van Hollen told the Huffington Post. “And a week from now, when they get around to repealing health care reform I think you will see they will go down and say this has zero cost impact.”

“It is a wholesale disregard of CBO estimates,” Van Hollen added. “After all, CBO is the one referee we have around here when it comes to the budget. So again, we are watching this unfold. But it does seem that they are putting in place the pieces to allow the Chairman of the Budget committee to literally make up the numbers as they go.”

The charges by the Van Hollen are fairly weighty in the wonky world of budgetary politics. But they underscore the extent to which Democrats feel that Republicans are turning the CBO and its scoring into partisan issues. Also on Tuesday, incoming Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) accused the budget office of misrepresenting the cost of the health care law for the benefit of persuading skittish Democrats to support the bill (the CBO estimated that the Affordable Care Act will reduce the deficit by more than $100 billion over ten years).

via Dems Accuse GOP Of ‘Enron-Type Accounting’ And Assaults On CBO.

Leave a comment

Filed under Health Care, Politics, The Economy

GOP Exempts Deficit Busting Policies From New Budget Rules | TPMDC

More on the Smoke and Mirrors the GOP is attempting to erect on Capitol Hill:

Republicans’ deficit reduction platform, which may have helped catapult them into the majority, is about to run headlong into a hard reality: Many of their key policy goals will increase the deficit dramatically.

To get around this fact, they’ve included measures in their new rules package to exempt some of their biggest legislative priorities from deficit consideration. Among the exceptions, which the House is likely to consider in the 112th Congress, are the health care repeal bill (scheduled for a vote a week from Wednesday), the 2001 and 2003 Bush tax cuts, an AMT patch, extending the estate tax, and more.

You can read more about the health care repeal side of this here. And more about the GOP’s Calvinball rules here.

The health care law, according to the Congressional Budget Office, will reduce the deficit by $143 billion through the end of the decade, and more so in the decade after that. Thus, repealing the law will blow a similarly sized hole in the deficit.

Republicans wave this off.

“No one believes that the job-killing health care law will lower costs, because it won’t,” Michael Steel, spokesman for incoming House Speaker John Boehner, told Politico. “That’s why we’ve pledged to repeal it, and replace it with common-sense reforms that will actually work.”

That statement echoes what Republicans have been saying for months now. But the CBO has said explicitly that repealing health care reform would cause the deficit to increase. The House GOP is set to ignore that warning when they hold their vote on repeal next week.

via GOP Exempts Deficit Busting Policies From New Budget Rules | TPMDC.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics, The Economy

House GOP seeks ‘unprecedented’ new powers over budget | Raw Story

I really hope these Republicans over-reach quickly so people realize what their real agenda is and vote them out in 2012….

And vote them out before they do too much damage…

Democrats and non-partisan policy experts alike expressed outraged at new rules proposed by House Republicans that would allow the incoming House Budget Committee chairman to unilaterally set spending ceilings.

Under one of the proposed rules Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI), who is expected to be the next House Budget Committee chairman, will be allowed to submit spending and revenue limits that “shall be considered as the completion of congressional action on a concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2011.”

Ryan is best known for his his radical plan to balance the budget by privatizing Social Security and Medicare.

Robert Greenstein and James R. Horney of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities described the new powers as “stunning and unprecedented.”

More:   House GOP seeks ‘unprecedented’ new powers over budget | Raw Story.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics, The Economy