I have mixed feelings about seeing this film. I loved the play, but Tyler Perry scares me….
I’ve hated all his movies up until now. To me, he has played the worst black stereotypes for a lot of cash.
But I think I will go see this film. I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt.
This article makes a very good point. Why hasn’t someone written the black male point of view? I would love to see that, too…
Or maybe Essex Hemphill or other writers wrote it, but it has yet to be filmed…
This is a gap in popular culture I would like to see explored outside of the world of E. Lynn Harris, the black, male Jacqueline Susann.
Not that there’s anything wrong with that…
I’ve already seen For Colored Girls.
I was slightly coerced (pushed!) by my colleagues to accompany fabulous Tell Me More host Michel Martin to a screening the other day.
But I’m thinking, “here we go again.”
The last thing I wanted (or needed) to see was another film that painted the black man as society’s stammering uber-demon, who comes to steal, kill and destroy; or another project that portrays black men as this nation’s perpetual delinquents — jobless, thoughtless sexual misfits who can’t stop screwing long enough to pick our heads up and realize how we’re letting down our women, our children and families, our God and our America.
Hide your kids, hide your wife, and hide your husbands, too … (you know the rest).
Quite frankly, it’s a narrative I’ve had enough of, thank you very much.
In For Colored Girls, yes, there is a disproportionate number of troubled black men. There is one redemptive male character who isn’t a killer, a rapist, or a liar.
But although the movie (I never saw the stage version) is basically the story of black women who are — in awful ways — victimized by black men, it is also very much the story of black women, pressing through the grit and gravel of life and finding a hope and place of vulnerability that they can depend on. And that’s a beautiful thing.
I left the screening with Michel disturbed, for many reasons. It was, partially, because the film was so emotionally intense. But I was also disturbed thinking about how the men in For Colored Girls — although perpetrators — had struggles, too.
Where was their healing, their resilience? Where is the window into that pain? And who’s telling that story?
I feel blessed to have a motley circle of friends. And, specifically, among my black male “homeboys,” there is no shortage of issues among us. One good friend is a self-described “flaming heterosexual,” for whom dating (and mating) is like a sport. Another is navigating his way through his own sexuality — in the closet some days, out and proud on others. One was sexually abused as a youngster. Another grew up with an absent mother. And another suddenly lost his father at a critical time in his life.
We all have issues, and we’re working through them daily — sometimes selfishly, and not so wisely. And I believe (scratch that, I know) that among us, we’ve at times “fit the profile” of destructive black men, and caused others (including the women we love) a portion of pain.
My point? Hopefully one day, more narratives will unearth the delicate taboo of the wounded black male and his journey to find “god in himself.”
For Colored Boys? Right now, it remains unwritten, but that’s a story I’m waiting to see.
via Finding A Place For Colored Boys : Tell Me More : NPR.
The Best Response I’ve Ever Seen To “Christians” Quoting the Bible to Condemn Homosexuality
This clip about says it all….
I think this must be the basis for the Dr Laura Schlessinger post about Leviticus and Homosexuality that went viral all over the web. When I quoted it, Dr Laura’s “people” did write me to tell me she never said it…but it remains one of the most popular posts on this blog with several “hits” almost every day even though it’s a fairly old post.
One of the few things I’ll never forgive England for is driving out all the Puritans and sending them here…
And I’m so tired of “Christians” saying love the sinner but hate the sin. Then patting themselves on the back for their “tolerance”.
This position still reflects hate.
And judgement.
My response is: “Who do they think they are to even think they are allowed to consider judging me or my life?”
Frankly, they should just mind their own business and worry about their own lives and their own “eternal salvation” and leave us alone. Completely. They should not even speak about people they will never allow themselves to understand.
I’ve always believed faith is a private, individual journey and that it’s a little bit tacky to carry on about it too much in public.
And very dangerous to try to impose your religious views on others to drive political and social agendas.
There is something called the Separation of Church and State in the Constitution…
The Founding Fathers realized you had to protect people from the Puritans and the Puritans from themselves.
And if “Christians” actually followed all the biblical laws cited in the Bible, they would all be in jail…
Instead, they all seem to be rather selective in what they choose to follow.
In other words, don’t speak to me about Homosexuality being condemned in the Bible as long as you are eating shrimp cocktails…
Let me be clear: I respect your right to believe whatever you chose to believe. Just keep it to yourself. I’ll try to do the same.
You stay out of of my bedroom and I’ll stay out of your Church.
Why don’t we all agree to just mind our own business and try to get through life with as much grace as possible? Christians shouldn’t talk about Homosexuality and, frankly, I would love not to have to talk about Christians and what I think they should be doing. Let’s just agree to live and let live and leave each other alone…
President Bartlett says it all…very well.
Share this:
Leave a comment
Filed under Gay, My Journey, Politics, Religion, Social Commentary