Tag Archives: The Economy

John Fleming, GOP Congressman, Blasts Obama Over Buffett Rule: I Can’t Afford A Tax Hike

Poor baby….

Just scraping by on $400k a year….

After deductions, I’m sure….

 

Rep. John Fleming (R-La.) appeared on MSNBC Monday morning to express opposition to President Barack Obama’s deficit reduction plan, which includes a proposal to raise taxes on the wealthy.

Fleming charged that the plan is a terrible idea which kills jobs provided by wealthy “job creators” who pay personal income taxes. When asked about his business ventures — including his role in a number of Subway restaurants and UPS stores — from which he earned $6.3 million last year, Fleming told MSNBC host Chris Jansing that his business expenses left him with little to tax “by the time I feed my family.”

Fleming told Jansing that the $6.3 million is “before you pay 500 employees, you pay rent, you pay equipment and food.”

“The actual net income of that was a mere fraction of that amount.”

“By the time I feed my family, I have maybe $400,000 left over,” Fleming said.

via John Fleming, GOP Congressman, Blasts Obama Over Buffett Rule: I Can’t Afford A Tax Hike.

Leave a comment

Filed under Congress, Elections, Politics, The Economy

The Truth About Social Security

This is the best summation of the truth about Social Security and the Deficit that I’ve seen:

 

 

Hat Tip:  MoveOn.org

Leave a comment

Filed under Elections, Politics

Citigroup To Start Charging Per-Month Fees On Low-Balance Accounts

Evil.

These big banks are simply evil….

I really don’t understand why anyone would do business with them.

I’m very happy with my local credit union and have been for 20 years.  I get all the same services as a big bank, but pay no fees on any of my accounts.  I really wish people would wise up and stop giving their business to these big banks.  I just don’t understand why anyone would support them…

From The Huffington Post:

 

Citigroup Inc said it will start charging a monthly fee of $10 on checking and savings accounts with combined balances of less than $1,500, joining a growing list of banks seeking to recoup revenue lost under new financial industry regulations.

The fee will be waived if a customer completes one direct deposit and one online bill payment per month through an account, or maintains a balance of at least $1,500 in checking and savings accounts, Citigroup said on Friday

The change takes effect in December.

Under Citi’s current fee structure, customers are not required to maintain minimum account balances but must complete five transactions a month through an account to avoid a monthly fee of $8.

Citigroup said it will not charge for debit card use or online bill payment.

Stephen Troutner, head of banking products for Citi’s U.S. consumer bank, said free debit card use could woo customers from other banks that are weighing whether to charge for debit card use, such as JPMorgan Chase & Co and Wells Fargo & Co.

“Customers have told us in no uncertain terms that is a huge source of irritation,” Troutner said.

New York-based Citi is the latest bank to tinker with its fee structure following changes in U.S. consumer banking regulations and laws over the last two years.

New regulations — part of a broad financial sector reform effort — limit overdraft fees and other penalty fees banks can charge.

In response, many banks have begun introducing monthly service fees for accounts, debit card use and visits to branches.

Bank of America Corp, the largest U.S. bank by assets, added checking account fees last year. The BofA changes include an ebanking account, which allows customers to use ATMs and online banking for free but charges a monthly fee of $7 for teller visits or receiving paper statements.

via Citigroup To Start Charging Per-Month Fees On Low-Balance Accounts.

Leave a comment

Filed under The Economy

France Introduces New Tax on High Incomes- At the Request of the Rich

Another reason to love the French…

This is an example of how you should handle deficits- both as a government and as a citizen.

This U.S. Congress is doing all it can to protect its millionaires from paying their fair share while taking more and more from the Middle Class and the poor.

The French also know a little bit about how nasty class warfare can become when the Rich have too much and flaunt it too openly.  They learned the hard way, it’s best to all pull together in the spirit of equality and solidarity.

I don’t want to hear a damn thing about “freedom fries”….

Viva la France!

 

 

The French government is to impose an extra tax of 3% on annual income above 500,000 euros (£440,000; $721,000).

It is part of a package of measures to try to cut the country’s deficit by 12bn euros over two years.

The tax increase came after some of France’s wealthiest people had called on the government to tackle its deficit by raising taxes on the rich.

Paris has also reduced its economic growth forecast for 2012 to 1.75% from a previous 2.25%.

‘Rigorous’

And it has cut its 2011 growth forecast from 2% to 1.75%, Prime Minister Francois Fillon has said.

He said the new tax would remain in place until France reduces its budget deficit back under the EU’s intended limit of 3% of GDP, which should occur in 2013.

France plans to trim its public deficit to 5.7 % this year, 4.6 % next year and 3% in 2013.

“This is a rigorous policy that will allow France to remain relaxed,” Mr Fillon said. “Our country must stick to its [deficit] commitments. It’s in the interest of all French people.”

Faced with flat growth, the persistent threat to the country’s precious AAA rating, and all sorts of turmoil on the nervous financial markets, President Sarkozy is wielding the axe.

In total he’s proposing 12bn euros of savings over the next two years.

Higher taxes for big companies, a cap on tax deductions applying to overtime – and a new “special contribution” from the wealthiest in the country.

It’s a U-turn – in so many ways – designed to reassure investors and voters alike that only he can be trusted with the French economy.

Sixteen executives, including Europe’s richest woman, the L’Oreal heiress Liliane Bettencourt, had offered in an open letter to pay a “special contribution” in a spirit of “solidarity”.

It appeared on the website of the French magazine Le Nouvel Observateur.

It was signed by some of France’s most high-profile chief executives, including Christophe de Margerie of oil firm Total, Frederic Oudea of bank Societe Generale, and Air France’s Jean-Cyril Spinetta.

They said: “We, the presidents and leaders of industry, businessmen and women, bankers and wealthy citizens would like the richest people to have to pay a ‘special contribution’.”

They said they had benefited from the French system and that: “When the public finances deficit and the prospects of a worsening state debt threaten the future of France and Europe and when the government is asking everybody for solidarity, it seems necessary for us to contribute.”

They warned, however, that the contribution should not be so severe that it would provoke an exodus of the rich or increased tax avoidance.

via BBC News – France introduces new tax on high incomes.

6 Comments

Filed under Congress, Elections, Politics, The Economy

Student Loans Skyrocket, Grants Decline as College Tuition Spikes

This is  a problem that really disturbs me….

For generations, we have , as a nation, tried to encourage education and make it possible for any deserving Student.  An educated work force is the way to lead the world both economically and creatively.  Thought leadership leads to jobs and innovation….

But I really think the Republicans don’t want kids to get educations.  If you can think critically, odds are you see right through the GOP “smoke and mirrors.”  An educated electorate is the last thing they want….

I also partially blame today’s parents and students for driving up college costs.  All these new dorms going up so the kids can have private suites and private  bathrooms.  They seem to expect concierge level treatment from the schools.  How much of the increase in college costs is due to having to provide these luxuries to attract and keep today’s pampered students?

Still,  ultimately, we have to find a solution to make college affordable and for kids to be able to get jobs when they graduate.  Otherwise, the housing bubble bust is going to be nothing compared to the coming Student Loan explosion when these kids can’t pay off these outrageous loans.

 

From RawStory.com:

It’s no secret that college is an expensive endeavor, one that continues to hit the wallet well after the graduation caps are tossed. Recent data shows that the student loan situation is growing worse every year: students are accruing more debt and not always paying it off on time.

Mark Kantrowitz is the publisher of FinAid.org and has testified before Congress about the importance of financial aid programs. The bad news, according to Kantrowitz, is that not only is the burden of debt on students heavier than ever, it’s not going to get lighter any time soon.

“The total student loan outstanding debt exceeded outstanding debt for credit cards for the first time in 2010,” he said. “At the end of this year or early next year, outstanding student loan debt is expected to pass the trillion dollar mark for the first time.”

Between 1999 and the beginning of 2011, the federal student loan debt ballooned 511 percent. In the first quarter of 1999, the outstanding student loan debt was around $90 billion. By the first quarter of 2011, slightly over a decade later, the balance was around $550 billion in outstanding federal student loans.

Though the private sector doesn’t have the same stringent reporting requirements as the federal loan program, it’s easy to see that private loans have followed a similar steep upswing: The National Postsecondary Student Aid Study for the 1999-2000 school year reported $3,589,813,190 in debt through private student loans, which increased by 67.6 percent in the next year, and then by another 20 percent the next. Now, private educational debt is about $405 billion.

Combined, there is currently about $955 billion in outstanding student loans.

Moody’s reported this week that the default rate for private student loans is at 5.4 percent, up from 4.5 percent a year ago.

The rising rate of default can be linked directly to the poor state of the economy, Kantrowitz said.

“The main drivers of default rates are unemployment rates, interest rates and graduation rates,” he said. “It makes sense: if you don’t graduate, you’ll have more difficulty paying back your loans.”

The unemployment rate for those with bachelor’s degrees has also been on the rise, corresponding to the rising default rate for loans. Loans’ interest rates are also on the rise, an unfortunate conflation of sunsetting legislation that kept federal rates down and the national deficit, held at bay in part with the earnings from loans.

Unlike the financial crisis triggered by subprime mortgages, however, the student loan problem is not a bubble. It’s a balloon. As Kantrowitz explains it, a bubble is a disconnect between the value of a thing and its actual cost.

“It isn’t a student loan bubble so much as a long-term trend toward decreasing college affordability,” he said. “You can’t flip an education, turn around and sell it for more. You can only use it.”

Because student loans are a highly profitable, low-cost program for the government — they make about 15 cents back for every dollar they lend — there’s no danger of the loan program ending. Even on defaulted loans, the government still manages to recover about 85 cents per dollar loaned. As the deficit needs more feeding, however, interest rates on educational loans are one way to try and fill the gap, as are rising tuitions at state and public schools, which force students to take on more debt and make it harder for them to pay back that debt.

As education gets more expensive, students will look for less expensive options for their futures, thus decreasing the number of bachelor’s degrees earned per year and lowering the nation’s education rate.

“College affordability is going to get tougher and tougher with each passing year,” Kantrowitz said. “Every dollar of government grants is a dollar spent and every dollar of loan is actually profitable to the government. It’s going to be more difficult for families to pay for college over the next decade. Some students will shift their enrollment from more expensive college to less expensive college.

“Some will just not go to college.”

via Student loans skyrocket, grants decline as college tuition spikes | The Raw Story.

Leave a comment

Filed under Education, Politics, The Economy

American Idiots: How Washington is Destroying the Economy

Interesting article in “Fortune” magazine written by a soon-to-be ex-Republican.

Even the Business community and Wall Street are getting fed up with the Tea Party Republicans running the show in Washington and acting like spoiled children.

And these guys live in fear of the party nominating one of the extremist like Michele Bachmann or Rick Perry.  They don’t recognize the existence of Sarah Palin or little Ricky Santorum.

These are the guys who supported George W Bush and the other Republicans in the past because they served their financial interests.  They don’t give a damn about social issues.

Now, the GOP is dependent on the Tea Party followers, who are economically ignorant, racist and irresponsible and the Religious Right, who these guys despise.

They are wondering where all their friends, the Country Club Republicans, went….

I have an answer:  They are now Democrats.

From Fortune.com:

 

The root of our current problem is that there are no grownups in positions of serious power in Washington. I’ve never felt this way before — and I’ve written business stories for more than 40 years, and about national finances for more than 20. Look, I certainly don’t worship Washington institutions. I called former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan the “Wizard of Oz” when he was known as the “Maestro.” I’ve said for more than a decade that the Social Security trust fund had no economic value and would be useless when the system’s cash flow turned negative — which I also predicted. But despite being an irreverent professional skeptic, I never felt there was a total absence of adult supervision in our nation’s capital. Now I do.

via American Idiots: How Washington is destroying the economy – The Term Sheet: Fortune’s deals blog Term Sheet.

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics, The Economy, Uncategorized

21 Reasons Rick Perry’s Texas Is a Complete Disaster | | AlterNet

Rick Perry, aka Governor GoodHair, is the gift that keeps on giving….

There’s almost as much to write about him as there is for Sarah Palin…

From Joshua Holland at Alternet.com:

Rick Perry’s road to the White House will be paved with spin and blatant lies of omission. He’s basing his entire campaign on a single data-point: Texas, with 10 percent of the country’s population, has produced 37 percent of net new jobs in the U.S. since the recovery.

That kernel of truth, as I noted recently, is mostly a result of a massive increase in the state’s population – much of it due to Hispanic immigration. Texas’ unemployment rate has actually risen even as those jobs were being created. Texas also leads the nation in creating crappy minimum wage jobs without benefits – the number of minimum wage workers increased by 150 percent between 2007 and 2010.

He also lucked into a boom in energy prices in his oil and gas-rich state – another factor having nothing to do with his governance.

Under Perry, endless tax breaks for politically connected Texas corporations helped create a massive budget deficit that Perry first addressed with federal stimulus funds – money from a program he decried as a “misguided” desire “to spend our children’s inheritance” — and then by cutting spending on education and the state’s already threadbare social services to the bone. With the exception of a few economic basket-cases like Mississippi, Texas is way ahead of the pack in the race to the bottom.

MORE:  http://www.alternet.org/story/152037/21_reasons_rick_perry%27s_texas_is_a_complete_disaster?akid=7406.275643.WRtvhl&rd=1&t=12

Leave a comment

Filed under Politics, Uncategorized

Why Rick Perry is headed to the White House: CNN

Scary, Scary article from James Moore at CNN.com….

Governor Goodhair is by far the most frightening of the possible GOP nominees.  He’s ruthless, campaigns very well, is telegenic and from the State that  gave us George W. Bush.  I also suspect he is the pick of the Corporations and the Rich who don’t think Romney or any of the other lunatics can beat President Obama.  They also want to use his religious zealotry to use the Religious Right again.

I can see how they are thinking:  Supporter of Corporations and the Rich.  Check.  Christian Conservative- at least on face value- check.  Looks good on TV and print media.  Check.  And so on….

I think Mr Moore has some valid points, but there is a lot about Rick Perry that has not yet been exposed to the national media….

However, if he is the nominee, it will be the nastiest, most brutal Presidential campaign we have ever seen….

My gut tells me he will fizzle out as time goes by, but I could be wrong as well…

Editor’s note: James Moore is a Texas-based Emmy award-winning former national TV news correspondent and co-author of the best-seller, “Bush’s Brain.”

Austin, Texas (CNN) — As a resident of Texas for 36 years, I keep wondering why the rest of the nation pays any attention to our political and cultural absurdities and yet still chooses Texans as presidents. Our most revered historical moment, the Alamo, was arguably a mass suicide. The slaughter in San Antonio was followed by a massacre at Goliad, the fall of the Confederacy to Union forces, and later by the Houston Astros. Texas has a legacy of losing.

None of this apparently matters, though, because America is beginning the process of electing another Texan to be president. Gigantic tax breaks for the wealthy and corporations, a trumped up war and a ruined economy from the last Texan seem incapable of dissuading supporters of Rick Perry.

His Saturday speech in South Carolina will make clear that he is entering the race for the White House and will spawn the ugliest and most expensive presidential race in U.S. history, and he will win. A C and D student, who hates to govern, loves to campaign, and barely has a sixth grader’s understanding of economics, will lead our nation into oblivion.

But I’m getting ahead of myself.

via Why Rick Perry is headed to the White House – CNN.com.

Leave a comment

Filed under Elections, Politics, Uncategorized

Warren Buffet: Stop Coddling the Super-Rich

The “Oracle of Omaha” has spoken….

For those who don’t know, Warren Buffet is President of Berkshire Hathaway and one of the richest men in America.  He is, obviously, very shrewd on investments and the Economy.

He’s also an honest man who believes the Rich are getting away with way too many benefits while the Middle Class and the poor are footing the bill for the Republican economic policies that led to the economic collapse.

I encourage you to read his entire Op Ed,  from today’s New York Times, as re-printed below:

OUR leaders have asked for “shared sacrifice.” But when they did the asking, they spared me. I checked with my mega-rich friends to learn what pain they were expecting. They, too, were left untouched.

While the poor and middle class fight for us in Afghanistan, and while most Americans struggle to make ends meet, we mega-rich continue to get our extraordinary tax breaks. Some of us are investment managers who earn billions from our daily labors but are allowed to classify our income as “carried interest,” thereby getting a bargain 15 percent tax rate. Others own stock index futures for 10 minutes and have 60 percent of their gain taxed at 15 percent, as if they’d been long-term investors.

These and other blessings are showered upon us by legislators in Washington who feel compelled to protect us, much as if we were spotted owls or some other endangered species. It’s nice to have friends in high places.

Last year my federal tax bill — the income tax I paid, as well as payroll taxes paid by me and on my behalf — was $6,938,744. That sounds like a lot of money. But what I paid was only 17.4 percent of my taxable income — and that’s actually a lower percentage than was paid by any of the other 20 people in our office. Their tax burdens ranged from 33 percent to 41 percent and averaged 36 percent.

If you make money with money, as some of my super-rich friends do, your percentage may be a bit lower than mine. But if you earn money from a job, your percentage will surely exceed mine — most likely by a lot.

To understand why, you need to examine the sources of government revenue. Last year about 80 percent of these revenues came from personal income taxes and payroll taxes. The mega-rich pay income taxes at a rate of 15 percent on most of their earnings but pay practically nothing in payroll taxes. It’s a different story for the middle class: typically, they fall into the 15 percent and 25 percent income tax brackets, and then are hit with heavy payroll taxes to boot.

Back in the 1980s and 1990s, tax rates for the rich were far higher, and my percentage rate was in the middle of the pack. According to a theory I sometimes hear, I should have thrown a fit and refused to invest because of the elevated tax rates on capital gains and dividends.

I didn’t refuse, nor did others. I have worked with investors for 60 years and I have yet to see anyone — not even when capital gains rates were 39.9 percent in 1976-77 — shy away from a sensible investment because of the tax rate on the potential gain. People invest to make money, and potential taxes have never scared them off. And to those who argue that higher rates hurt job creation, I would note that a net of nearly 40 million jobs were added between 1980 and 2000. You know what’s happened since then: lower tax rates and far lower job creation.

Since 1992, the I.R.S. has compiled data from the returns of the 400 Americans reporting the largest income. In 1992, the top 400 had aggregate taxable income of $16.9 billion and paid federal taxes of 29.2 percent on that sum. In 2008, the aggregate income of the highest 400 had soared to $90.9 billion — a staggering $227.4 million on average — but the rate paid had fallen to 21.5 percent.

The taxes I refer to here include only federal income tax, but you can be sure that any payroll tax for the 400 was inconsequential compared to income. In fact, 88 of the 400 in 2008 reported no wages at all, though every one of them reported capital gains. Some of my brethren may shun work but they all like to invest. (I can relate to that.)

I know well many of the mega-rich and, by and large, they are very decent people. They love America and appreciate the opportunity this country has given them. Many have joined the Giving Pledge, promising to give most of their wealth to philanthropy. Most wouldn’t mind being told to pay more in taxes as well, particularly when so many of their fellow citizens are truly suffering.

Twelve members of Congress will soon take on the crucial job of rearranging our country’s finances. They’ve been instructed to devise a plan that reduces the 10-year deficit by at least $1.5 trillion. It’s vital, however, that they achieve far more than that. Americans are rapidly losing faith in the ability of Congress to deal with our country’s fiscal problems. Only action that is immediate, real and very substantial will prevent that doubt from morphing into hopelessness. That feeling can create its own reality.

Job one for the 12 is to pare down some future promises that even a rich America can’t fulfill. Big money must be saved here. The 12 should then turn to the issue of revenues. I would leave rates for 99.7 percent of taxpayers unchanged and continue the current 2-percentage-point reduction in the employee contribution to the payroll tax. This cut helps the poor and the middle class, who need every break they can get.

But for those making more than $1 million — there were 236,883 such households in 2009 — I would raise rates immediately on taxable income in excess of $1 million, including, of course, dividends and capital gains. And for those who make $10 million or more — there were 8,274 in 2009 — I would suggest an additional increase in rate.

My friends and I have been coddled long enough by a billionaire-friendly Congress. It’s time for our government to get serious about shared sacrifice.

Warren E. Buffett is the chairman and chief executive of Berkshire Hathaway.

via Stop Coddling the Super-Rich – NYTimes.com.

3 Comments

Filed under Congress, Elections

Wall Street Crashes, London Burns

As always, fascinating thoughts from Frank Rich…

And I saw the McQueen show at the Metropolitan Museum in New York in June  and I was amazed at the crowds.  People waited hours to get in.  I’m a member of the Met so I skipped the lines and that’s the only reason I saw it.  I don’t do lines of more than a reasonable duration…It was fascinating and totally theatrical, but I could not understand why so many people were fascinated.

Now I know.  It was a sign of the end approaching…

And, I always knew “The Phantom of the Opera” would lead to the downfall of civilization…

Frank Rich in New York Magazine (Emphasis is mine) :

I think I’m moving from anger to dread, too. We pay attention to the market because it feels like a sport (scored in clear-cut numbers) and because one way or the other we know we will be affected by it, whether we own shares or not. I am completely unprescient about the market — though no less so than, say, S&P, Geithner, Bernanke, Greenspan, and all the others who failed to see the last crash and/or this one coming — but last Thursday, the morning just before the big drop began, I had a premonition. (And I am not by and large superstitious.) I was catching up (at the last minute) with the McQueen extravaganza at the Met. That same morning the Times had a front-page story about the rebound in luxury retailing. Once I entered the McQueen show, I was struck by how the installation, with its smoke and mirrors and S&M touches, looked like a cross between Phantom of the Opera**  and the orgy scene in Eyes Wide Shut** . Whatever else the McQueen show was about, it’s about decadence — and about luxury goods beyond the reach of 99.9 percent of the throngs gawking at them. Something about the discrepancy between the opulence and the masses thronging barricades to get in gave me a premonition that a crash was on its way. Maybe it’s because I associate the crash of 1987 with the opening of Phantom on Broadway in early 1988. Conspicuous over-the-top decadence in America always seems to lead to a bad end.

via Wall Street Crashes, London Burns: Frank Rich and Adam Moss Discuss Downgrades, Riots, and the Portents of McQueen — Daily Intel.

Leave a comment

Filed under Broadway, Elections, Politics, The Economy