Tag Archives: Republicans

The New Spin: The White House Would Be A Step Down For Sarah Palin | TPMDC

They know she can’t win, so they’ll do anything to try to stop her from running….

Pop quiz: you’re a right-wing commentator looking at a string of polls showing Sarah Palin’s poll numbers sinking to new lows even as the weak field of GOP presidential contenders continues to thin out. But a large chunk of your audience would sooner eat glass than hear Palin’s chances maligned by one of their own. What do you do?

Here’s one answer: claim that Palin is even more powerful outside the White House and that the presidency would be a step down for her.

It’s a line gaining some traction among pundits on the right. Take conservative media guru Andrew Breitbart, who suggested in GQ this month that Palin would be truly unstoppable if she only didn’t get bogged down by, say, being President.

“I think the presidency is beneath her,” Breitbart told GQ. “There’s more power in being Oprah Winfrey than in being Barack Obama. It would be my goal for Palin to become Oprah and be the ultimate kingmaker for twenty-odd years. Oprah anointed Barack Obama.”

Then there’s Ann Coulter, who has offered similar arguments in multiple interviews.

“I think it would be a step down for her,” she said in an MNSBC appearance last month. “It’s like saying Rush Limbaugh should run for President. She’s huge, she has enormous power. She sends out a Twitter on death panels and everyone’s talking about it. I think it would be crazy for her to run for president.”

Coulter offered a similar assessment last year to CBS, saying that Palin “has more influence than a President does.”

via The New Spin: The White House Would Be A Step Down For Sarah Palin | TPMDC.

1 Comment

Filed under Elections, Politics

“Tax, Tax, Tax the Rich!” Calls to Tax Wealthy Making Right Wingers Sweat? | | AlterNet

It’s about time….

The main driver of the Federal Deficit is the Bush Tax Cuts for the Wealthy.

End those tax cuts for the wealthy and get out of Afghanistan and Iraq and we won’t have any budget problems…

A simple but powerful chant is now starting to reverberate, all across the country, in protests against budgets cuts gone wild.

“How to fix the deficit?” marchers are shouting. “Tax, tax, tax the rich!”

That sentiment, unfortunately, hasn’t yet reached deep into many law-making chambers. Last week, in the nation’s capital, Rep. Jan Schakowsky from Illinois did introduce legislation that would up taxes on income over $1 million, from the current 35 percent to a range of new rates that run from 45 to 49 percent.

But the budget debate in Congress still revolves almost exclusively around questions about how much to cut, with no attention at all to the vast untaxed fortunes of America’s super rich. In state legislatures, largely the same story.

So why are cheerleaders for America’s rich starting to sweat? They’re hearing the rising drumbeat — from labor and community groups the nation over — for new “millionaire” taxes. And they’re watching the polls, too. Over 80 percent of Americans, the latest surveys show, want higher taxes on our richest.

via “Tax, Tax, Tax the Rich!” Calls to Tax Wealthy Making Right Wingers Sweat? | | AlterNet.

Leave a comment

Filed under Elections, Politics, The Economy

Poll: Public already losing patience with new Congress | McClatchy

That was a short Honeymoon….

I love it about politicians wanting to explain “the deliberate pace of Washington” to their constituents….

Never crosses their mind to change or adapt…

I’m afraid this is just going to get messier with the GOP passing insane bills in the House and the Senate stopping them.  At least as long as the Dems hold the Senate…

It could get really scary after 2012 if the GOP takes the Senate, too….

WASHINGTON — Once again, the public is getting increasingly disgusted with Washington.

It sees a failure to adopt remedies for even the most basic, pressing issues of the day, as Congress struggles to craft a federal budget. And incumbents are getting worried about the political implications.

“It’s hurting some of us,” said Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, who’s up for re-election next year. “They blame everybody.”

A new Pew Research Center poll shows that about half of Americans think the debate over spending and deficits has been “generally rude and disrespectful.”

There’s even bipartisan agreement — 48 percent of Republicans and Democrats have that view, as well as 57 percent of independents. President Barack Obama signed legislation Friday to provide funding to keep the government open until April 8, the sixth such temporary extension in the 6-month-old fiscal year.

Pew surveyed 1,525 adults from March 8-14. The poll’s findings suggest the political losers so far have been Republicans, who rode a wave of voter irritation to win control of the House of Representatives last fall.

After the election, 35 percent said Republicans had a better approach to the deficit, expected to reach a record $1.65 trillion this year. This month, that number has plunged to 21 percent.

People don’t think Obama has better ideas, either — 20 percent found his approach better, down from November’s 24 percent. Total sample margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points.

The most restless constituency has involved supporters of the conservative tea party movement. After the November election, where backers helped elect dozens of congressional Republicans, three of four movement supporters liked GOP budget plans. This month that figure dropped to 52 percent.

“People are growing impatient,” said Carroll Doherty, Pew associate director.

They’ve been impatient for years. In 2006, voters gave Democrats control of both Houses of Congress for the first time in 12 years. Two years later, Obama, a Democrat, reclaimed the White House for his party after eight years of Republican George W. Bush. Last year, Republicans reclaimed control of the House.

“The American public is getting tired of change elections and then not seeing change. There have been three change elections in a row, but people today figure things are still adrift,” said Lee Miringoff, the director of the Marist Institute for Public Opinion, which conducts the McClatchy-Marist poll.

Political veterans are scrambling to educate their constituents about the deliberate pace of Washington.

via Poll: Public already losing patience with new Congress | McClatchy.

Leave a comment

Filed under Elections, Politics, Polls

House to vote on ‘In God We Trust’ resolution; Still No Sign of GOP Jobs creations bills

These guys were supposedly elected to create jobs…

That was their entire campaign theme…

And they have done absolutely nothing about it since they were elected….

It’s one extraneous or vindictive bill after another….

I can’t believe how much time they can waist on worthless resolutions like this…

I hope people will remember the GOP has just postured, poised, grandstanded and screwed around come election time…

But I’m not hopeful…

The US House of Representatives will have a chance to vote on a resolution to affirm the phrase “In God We Trust” as the nation’s official motto after it was approved by the House Judiciary Committee on Thursday.

Congressman J. Randy Forbes (R-VA), the founder and chairman of the Congressional Prayer Caucus, sponsored the legislation. It would encourage the public display of the motto in all public buildings, public schools and government institutions.

He said he introduced the bill in January because he was troubled by a pattern of omitting God from the nation’s heritage.

“There is a small minority who believes America does not have the right to trust in God, who believes the United States should not affirm trust in God, and who actively seek to remove any recognition of that trust,” Forbes said.

The phrase “In God We Trust” was made the official U.S. motto in 1956, one year after the phrase “under God” was incorporated into the Pledge of Allegiance.

Critics of the resolution said it violated the establishment clause of the Constitution, which states that “Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion.”

via House to vote on ‘In God We Trust’ resolution | The Raw Story.

Leave a comment

Filed under Elections, Politics, Religion

Ed Schultz: Ann Coulter Is ‘Toxic,’ Spreading Misinformation On Radiation

She really has gotten the publicity for her latest idiotic remarks….

I wish there was some way we could just ignore people like Ann Coulter, Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann…

But we can’t….

Even though it would kill them to lose the limelight…

While some poor misguided, people actually take them seriously,  they are too dangerous to ignore…

The George W Bush presidency proved that…..

Ed Schultz called Ann Coulter “toxic” and said that she was spreading misinformation about the health effects of radiation.

Coulter caused controversy by writing a column about the Japanese nuclear crisis, which said that radiation can actually be healthy. She brought up a number of scientific studies which she said concluded that “at some level–much higher than the minimums set by the U.S. government–radiation is good for you,” and can even reduce the risk of cancer.

Schultz heaped scorn on this theory on his Friday show.

“A lot of people say Ann Coulter is toxic,’ Schultz said. “But we had no idea that she would take that literally…you would laugh at her if she wasn’t making light of a terrible tragedy.”

via Ed Schultz: Ann Coulter Is ‘Toxic,’ Spreading Misinformation On Radiation (VIDEO).

Leave a comment

Filed under Elections, Politics

Bill Maher: Republicans Are Like Meth Addicts, Always Focused on Imaginary Problems | AlterNet

From Bill Maher via AlterNet:

When you go down the list of useless distractions that make up the Republican party agenda — public unions, Sharia law, anchor babies, the mosque at Ground Zero, ACORN, National Public Radio, the war on Christmas, the new Black Panthers, Planned Parenthood, Michelle Obama’s war on dessert…you realize that the reason nothing gets done in America is that one of the political parties puts so much [energy] into fantasy problems than real ones.

Governing this country with Republicans is like rooming with a Meth addict; you want to address real-life problems, like when the rent is due, and they’re saying, “How can you even think of that stuff when there’s police scanner voices coming out of the air conditioner unit??”

via Bill Maher: Republicans Are Like Meth Addicts, Always Focused on Imaginary Problems | AlterNet.

2 Comments

Filed under Elections, Politics

Crazy Right Wing Woman of the Day: Victoria Jackson’s Homophobic Comments About “Glee”

Former Saturday Night Live actress Victorian Jackson went off the deep end a long time ago…

She blames Hollywood liberals for the fact that her career went nowhere after SNL…

I think the real reason is that, without good writers and directors, she’s just not funny…

She’s a mean, homophobic, racist harpy…

What is it with all these Republican “Mean Girls”?

Sarah Palin, Victoria Jackson, Phyllis Schlafly, Ann Coulter, Michelle Backmann, Lindsey Graham…

Bitter, bitter women…

From The Huffington Post:

Victoria Jackson may have earned her fame as a comedian, but her recent comments on “Glee” are no laughing matter.

The former “Saturday Night Live” star, now an outspoken political conservative, hit out at the high school choir dramedy in a homophobic rant in her new column for the conservative WorldNetDaily.com. Jackson wrote:

“Did you see “Glee” this week? Sickening! And, besides shoving the gay thing down our throats, they made a mockery of Christians – again! I wonder what their agenda is? Hey, producers of “Glee” – what’s your agenda? One-way tolerance?”

In the most recent episode of the show, there was a long awaited kiss between two gay characters, Kurt (played by Golden Globe winner Chris Colfer) and Blaine, and Kathy Griffin played a religious, tea party political candidate, modeled after Sarah Palin.

Jackson’s comments came after a string of anti-Muslim and Arab diatribe, and immediately following her saying:

“This new al-Qaida magazine for women has beauty tips and suicide-bomber tips! Gimme a break! That is as ridiculous as two men kissing on the mouth! And I don’t care what is politically correct. Everyone knows that two men on a wedding cake is a comedy skit, not an “alternate lifestyle”! There I said it! Ridiculous!”

via Victoria Jackson On ‘Glee’: Former ‘SNL’ Star’s Homophobic Comments.

Here she is in “action”:

Leave a comment

Filed under Elections, Entertainment, Television

Avoiding the President | Mother Jones

I’ve noticed this dynamic and assumed it was because the GOP still does not consider President Obama a legitimate President since they think he was born on Mars or something….

I forgot how well he can play them when they go one to one….

May be some truth here….

It is disgusting how the Republicans and special interest groups like the NRA  disowner not only President Obama, but the Office of the President.  Can you imagine how they would have screamed if Dems had treated Bush this way?

Still, in the past there’s always been a bipartisan assumption that the president is the president, and if he invites you to a meeting, you go. That’s broken down recently, and I attribute it to two things: Obama’s appearance at the Republican retreat last January, followed by his healthcare summit a month later. When Obama offered to speak at the retreat, Republicans let him do it. He’s the president, after all. And when Obama initially proposed the healthcare summit, even uber-obstructionist Bill Kristol echoed the old school sentiment: “Obviously when the president invites you to the White House, you go.”

But no longer. Now conservatives do their best to delay meetings at the White House, or they just outright refuse, as LaPierre did. Why? I think it’s partly because Obama scored such obvious public opinion wins at both the retreat and the summit. He’s mastered the art of controlling the conversation and sounding like a voice of reason in settings like this, and conservatives — especially tea party conservatives — don’t trust themselves any longer to come out ahead when they’re negotiating with him. They now consider even closed-door meetings at the White House to be traps, and they are, to put it bluntly, afraid of Obama. I’m not quite sure whether that’s good news or bad.

via Avoiding the President | Mother Jones.

Leave a comment

Filed under Elections, Politics

Ann Coulter: ‘Radiation is Actually Good For You’ | TPMDC

This woman isn’t as dumb as she seems.

She knows that saying insane things like this will get her publicity.

She’s not dumb, just evil….

And insensitive…

And a totally self-absorbed, self-promoting opportunist…

I can’t stand the sight of her…

According to conservative columnist Ann Coulter, this whole Japanese nuclear crisis is overblown and “radiation is actually good for you” and the media isn’t reporting its benefits enough.

On The O’Reilly Factor last night, Coulter spoke about her recent column that cites a number of articles in the New York Times and “a stunning number of physicists” showing radiation has a positive effect on cancer patients.

A skeptical O’Reilly retorted Coulter’s evidence with this, “by your account we should all be heading for the nuclear reactor leaking and kind of sunbathing out there in front of — come on.”

Coulter responded by citing a study, mentioned by the Times , held in Canada finding that tuberculosis patients subjected to multiple chest X-rays had much lower rates of breast cancer than the general population. “There may be some doses of radiation in the human body can ward off infection,” she said.

Joking aside, O’Reilly wanted Coulter to be “responsible” and admit that “some radiation will kill you.” Coulter refused.

via Ann Coulter: ‘Radiation is Actually Good For You’ (Video) | TPMDC.

Leave a comment

Filed under Elections, Energy, Media, Politics, Tea Party

My Thoughts: The Rich Are Different

“Let me tell you something about the very rich.  They are different from you and me.” F. Scott Fitzgerald from “The Rich Boy”

I talk a lot about the Rich and post a lot of articles about the Rich.  I think it’s time I defined and clarified my thoughts-even if I speak in generalities.

First of all, I want to differentiate between two categories of wealth.

One, I’ll call simply, The Wealthy.  The other, I’ll call The Rich.

I do not have anything against The Wealthy.  They really aren’t that different from you and me.  This is the social category that we, in the South, used to call “Old Money.”

The Wealthy had enough class and taste that the socio-economic differences are more subtle.  They would be horrified to flaunt their wealth or to think it made them “better” than other people.  This category of the financially blessed was usually better educated and, thus, aware of their privilege and the obligations that went with it.  They understood the concept of “those to whom much is given, much is expected.”

I love the honest Wealthy folks I’ve known or known of in my life.  These are people who gave back and made the world a better place.

The Wealthy usually did not involve themselves actively in Politics.  If they did, it was usually out of a sense of duty or obligation to try to make things better for those less fortunate.  It was kind of like joining the Junior League for them.

They were frequently Democrats.

The Wealthy understood shared responsibility and honor.  There was a time when the Partners of Wall Street firms and Investment Banks were personally financially responsible for any losses.  That is gone with the wind…

In the past, the Rich would try to emulate the Wealthy.  Not today…

The Rich are the ones I can’t stand.  We used to call this social group “New Money.”

These are the ones who, as a rule, are taking over our government.

There are exceptions to the “New Money” condition.  The Koch Brothers, for example, have had money for several generations, but they are Rich, not Wealthy.

No matter how much money the Koch’s donate to the ballet and museums, they have no class or true sense of societal obligation.  They are Rich, not Wealthy because they have no social conscience and only care about money.  No matter how hard they try to seem otherwise, they are vulgar.

People recognize this and that’s why David Koch was booed at the American Ballet Theatre performance of “The Nutcracker” last December even when it was pointed out he gave the ABT $2.5 million.  Money does not buy class or absolve one of all sins- even in New York….

The Rich build their lives around money.  It is all that matters to them.  They never have enough, always want more and are more than willing to do anything immoral, unethical or illegal to get it and keep it.  They get away with this because they use their money to build a parallel world where the rules-and laws- don’t apply to them, but to everyone else.

As the late Leona Helmsley, who was Rich, not Wealthy, said: “Only the little people pay taxes.”

This is the mantra of the Rich.

The Rich have taken precedence over the Wealthy in today’s world.  The Wealthy, being mostly Democrats, didn’t fight back and were over-powered by the Rich on Wall Street and in Washington.  The Rich did away with the concept of individual responsibility for actions within financial firms.  They only want individual responsibility to apply to the poor and middle classes.

The Wealthy who used to be part of the GOP, who were called “Cloth Coat Republicans” or “Country Club Republicans” are now extinct.

The Rich are the new Wall Street Barons and Hedge Fund Kings who made their money manipulating the system and not creating anything.  They turned Wall Street into Las Vegas- both in tone and style.  They manipulate numbers.  Money is a concept to them, not a reality.

They don’t build factories or create jobs.  They never will.   That is too much work.  They are morally bankrupt.  They feel no need to “give back” as they really didn’t work hard to earn anything;  they just took it.

The Rich are the top 1% of the population who own about 35% of the total wealth in this country.  Of all the wealth created in the last 30 years or so, 47% went to this group.  And they don’t want to pay taxes on it.  This alone is enough to make me a socialist.

The Rich are the ones who manipulated the system so CEO’s,who in 1960 made an income of 42 times the average worker’s salary, by 2000 made 531 times the average worker’s salary.  And now pay the lowest tax rate since the 1950’s.

This is the crowd that runs companies into the ground, brings the entire economy to the brink of disaster, destroys jobs and livelihoods for the middle class, then takes a “golden parachute” of millions of dollars for their efforts.  There is no accountability for performance or decision-making within this group.

The New Money crowd, that have become the Rich of Wall Street and the financial powers that drive Washington, focus solely on money.  Getting it, keeping it, making more of it.  They worship money itself, not what it can do.  These people do not drive the economy- or only a small portion of it- as to them money is something to be hoarded and bragged about. Or flashed around with multiple homes, cars, planes, diamonds and wives.  They don’t spend it on creating jobs, as they and the GOP would like you to think.  That will never be their goal or priority.

Money is their God and they want to honor it.

I hate the nouveau and not so nouveau Rich who are determined to destroy the Middle Class and let the poor starve.  I detest the nouveau Rich who want children to grow up in poverty and ignorance and deny Health Care because people can’t afford private insurance.  I abhor the Rich who want to take money from Social Security and leave the elderly to eat cat food so they can keep more money in their Cayman Islands or Swiss Bank accounts.

The Wealthy class of yesterday would never behave this way.

And if they tried, the Government would stop them.

At least for the last 80 years.

Hopefully, this clarifies my position.

_________________________________________________________________________________

Footnote:  You can check my facts from my main point of reference and learn much more about “the numbers” here:

http://sociology.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/wealth.html

2 Comments

Filed under Elections, Politics, Scott's Commentary, Social Commentary, Uncategorized