Great article from Nicholas Kristof in today’s New York Times.
No matter where you fall on the issue of Teacher’s Unions, it makes sense….
This is another one of those issues that just seems impossible to argue…
Who wants poor quality, under-paid teachers?
Oh, the the Republicans, who fear a well educated electorate with strong critical thinking skills….
Here is an excerpt from Mr Kristof’s column. I encourage you to click the link and read it in it’s entirety. Italics emphasis is mine…
Until a few decades ago, employment discrimination perversely strengthened our teaching force. Brilliant women became elementary school teachers, because better jobs weren’t open to them. It was profoundly unfair, but the discrimination did benefit America’s children.
These days, brilliant women become surgeons and investment bankers — and 47 percent of America’s kindergarten through 12th-grade teachers come from the bottom one-third of their college classes (as measured by SAT scores). The figure is from a study by McKinsey & Company, “Closing the Talent Gap.”
Changes in relative pay have reinforced the problem. In 1970, in New York City, a newly minted teacher at a public school earned about $2,000 less in salary than a starting lawyer at a prominent law firm. These days the lawyer takes home, including bonus, $115,000 more than the teacher, the McKinsey study found.
We all understand intuitively the difference a great teacher makes. I think of Juanita Trantina, who left my fifth-grade class intoxicated with excitement for learning and fascinated by the current events she spoke about. You probably have a Miss Trantina in your own past.
One Los Angeles study found that having a teacher from the 25 percent most effective group of teachers for four years in a row would be enough to eliminate the black-white achievement gap.
Recent scholarship suggests that good teachers, even kindergarten teachers, increase their students’ earnings many years later. Eric A. Hanushek of Stanford University found that an excellent teacher (one a standard deviation better than average, or better than 84 percent of teachers) raises each student’s lifetime earnings by $20,000. If there are 20 students in the class, that is an extra $400,000 generated, compared with a teacher who is merely average.
A teacher better than 93 percent of other teachers would add $640,000 to lifetime pay of a class of 20, the study found.
Look, I’m not a fan of teachers’ unions. They used their clout to gain job security more than pay, thus making the field safe for low achievers. Teaching work rules are often inflexible, benefits are generous relative to salaries, and it is difficult or impossible to dismiss teachers who are ineffective.
But none of this means that teachers are overpaid. And if governments nibble away at pensions and reduce job security, then they must pay more in wages to stay even.
Moreover, part of compensation is public esteem. When governors mock teachers as lazy, avaricious incompetents, they demean the profession and make it harder to attract the best and brightest. We should be elevating teachers, not throwing darts at them.
via Pay Teachers More – NYTimes.com.
A Generation of Slackers? Not So Much
I found this article fascinating…
I’m one of those people quick to call the younger generation slackers. They are entirely too coddled. Hence, my loving reference to them among friends and on my blogs as SJI’s (Slack Jawed Idiots).
But I’m ready to admit that there are other factors that aren’t so obvious. Technology has changed the world and removed walls and barriers. It has made it easier to blur the lines between work life and home life.
This Generation also sees things differently due to, not only being coddled, but due to the vast amount of information this technology has made so easily available.
They also don’t have the expectations many of us from my generation had- past tense-of having a job for life as long as they worked hard.
They know that social contract is null and void.
They therefore, appropriately, focus more on their real life.
In short, it’s a different world than the one we expected to see…
They may be more realistic than my generation was…
I’ll have to think about this some more. This article in today’s New York Times is a good place to start…
But it still doesn’t excuse their poor style, fashion and cultural choices…
MORE: A Generation of Slackers? Not So Much – NYTimes.com.
Share this:
Leave a comment
Filed under Education, Social Commentary, Uncategorized
Tagged as Baby Boomers, Culture, education, Generation X, jobs, Social Commentary, Work